通讯作者: 黄葭燕, jiayanhuang@fudan.edu.cn

DOI：10.12201/bmr.202410.00028

Establishment of index system of motivation analysis of development assistance for health

• 摘要：目的：构建卫生发展援助动因分析指标体系，以深入了解当今以发达国家为主的援助国自21世纪以来的卫生发展援助动因，并为卫生发展援助动因提供量化分析工具。方法：基于“混合模型”（hybrids models）构建初始动因分析理论框架，运用德尔菲专家咨询法进行指标筛选，采用层次分析法确定指标权重。结果：构建包含4个一级指标、10个二级指标、22个三级指标的指标体系。4个一级指标分别为：援助国政治利益、援助国经济利益、援助国安全利益、受援国需求。两轮咨询的问卷有效回收率均为95.5%，专家权威系数为0.867，Kendall’s W系数分别为0.216-0.322，结果可靠。结论：本研究初步构建了一套用于分析卫生发展援助动因的指标体系，有助于增加对援助国援助行为的理解，加强与他国在卫生发展援助的协调合作。同时，该指标体系为中国未来在卫生发展援助决策方面提供了辅助的量化分析工具。

  关键词： 卫生发展援助; 指标体系; 德尔菲法; 层次分析法

   

  Abstract: Objective: To establish an index system of motivation analysis of development assistance for health (DAH), so as to gain a deeper understanding of the motivations behind DAH provided predominantly by developed countries since the 21st century. Additionally, this study aims to offer a quantitative tool for DAH motivation analysis. Methods: An initial theoretical framework for motivation analysis was constructed based on hybrid models. The Delphi method was used for indexes screening, and the analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine index weights. Results: The index system was comprised of 4 primary indexes, 10 secondary indexes, and 22 tertiary indexes. The 4 primary indexes are: political interests of donor countries, economic interests of donor countries, security interests of donor countries, and the needs of recipient countries. The effective response rates for two rounds of consultations were both 95.5%, with an authority coefficient of 0.867 and Kendall’s W coefficients ranging from 0.216 to 0.322, indicating the reliability of the results. Conclusion: The index system for analyzing the motivation of DAH was preliminarily established by this research, which helps enhance the understanding of donors DAH behaviors and strengthens coordination and cooperation with other donors in DAH. And it provides a quantitative analytical tool to assist in future DAH decision making for Chinese government.

  Key words: Development Assistance for Health; Index system; Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

  提交时间：2024-10-11

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 兰小梦, 潘杰, 赵莉. 健康示范县评价指标体系构建——基于德尔菲和层次分析法. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00016

  滕佳利, 宋桂杭, 李倩, 劳颖谦, 韩优莉. 基于DIP的医保服务质量评价指标体系的构建与应用——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202303.00030

  王欣媛, 徐佳苗, 刘健, 郁昕怡, 黄晓光. 基于层次分析法的区域医疗中心评价指标体系构建研究. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202303.00011

  杜炎秋, 梁笛, 黄葭燕. 日本卫生发展援助的资金流向分析(1990-2019年). 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202103.00004

  吴佩林, 陈文晶, 张思琪, 徐鹏宇, 苗艳青, 王丽丹. 基于德尔菲法的两病门诊用药保障机制评估指标体系构建. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202211.00016

  徐中阳, 尚珊. 基于模糊层次分析法的在线健康社区用户体验评价. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202009.00004

  崔月颖. 基于熵权法的县域医共体健康绩效评价指标体系权重分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202405.00003

  赵宁, 孙力光, 高广颖, 韩优莉, 杨佳. 基于灰色综合评价法的北京市医疗保障高质量发展指标体系评价实证研究. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202306.00011

  田瑞. 移动社交媒体中疾病类健康信息评价指标体系构建及实证研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00003

  石欣怡, 彭明瑶, 张子楠, 王中华. 紧密型医共体整合健康管理服务能力综合评价指标体系构建研究. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202312.00005

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2024-07-15	bmr.202410.00028V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论