DOI：10.12201/bmr.202409.00047

Study on enhancing accessibility to long-term care insurance for economically disadvantaged populations: based on interdepartmental collaborative mechanisms

• 摘要：目的：对部分试点城市长期护理保险制度针对经济困难人群的救助机制进行梳理和比较，基于跨部门协同机制提出优化建议，以期提升制度可及性。方法：搜集自2016年以来试点城市的长期护理保险制度政策文件中有关救助经济困难人群的规定，并进行归纳和分析。结果：有8个试点城市的长期护理保险制度建立了针对经济困难人群的救助机制，救助方法主要为资助缴费参保、补贴自负费用和提供就业培训三类。目前的实践存在着信息互通有待加强、不同政策交叠冲突、保费资助和个人自负费用补贴异质化等问题。结论：建议从结构性协同和程序性协同两方面考虑优化路径，例如数据平台互联互通、整合护理补贴制度、基层实现一窗受理、上级开展专项任务等结构性协同机制，以及明确救助边界、资助缴费参保、补贴自负费用、提供就业培训等程序性协同机制。

  关键词： 长期护理保险; 社会救助; 经济困难人群; 跨部门协同

   

  Abstract: Objective: This paper aims to review and compare the assistance mechanisms for economically disadvantaged populations within the long-term care insurance systems of selected pilot cities. It proposes optimization suggestions based on inter-agency collaboration mechanisms to improve accessibility for economically disadvantaged populations. Methods: This paper collected and analyzed regulations related to assistance for economically disadvantaged populations from policy documents of long-term care insurance systems in pilot cities since 2016. Results: Eight pilot cities have established assistance mechanisms for economically disadvantaged populations within their long-term care insurance systems. The main forms of assistance are subsidized premium payments for insurance enrollment, subsidies for out-of-pocket expenses, and provision of employment training. Current practices face issues such as obstacles to platform interoperability, policy overlap conflicts, and heterogeneity in premium subsidies and out-of-pocket expense subsidies. Conclusion: It is recommended to consider optimization paths from structural and procedural collaboration aspects. Structural collaboration mechanisms may include platform interoperability, integration of care subsidy systems, single-window service at the grassroots level, and special tasks carried out by higher authorities. Procedural collaboration mechanisms may involve clarifying assistance boundaries, subsidizing premium payments for insurance enrollment, subsidizing out-of-pocket expenses, and providing employment training.

  Key words: Long-term care insurance; Public assistance; Economically disadvantaged populations; Inter-agency collaboration

  提交时间：2024-09-23

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 王馨慧, 孙晨晗, 刘稳, 胡敏. 长期护理保险对居家社区护理需求的规范与引导:国际经验及启示. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202402.00001

  郝恬然, 李颖. 我国长期护理保险28个试点方案研究——基于内容分析法. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202105.00014

  侯艳杰, 王瑜, 颜诗源, 张文静, 张琳, 姚俊. 长期护理保险对中老年人医疗服务利用、医疗负担及健康的影响——基于双重差分法的实证研究. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202107.00029

  张良文, 付思佳, 王逸凡, 袁玲, 方亚. 基于SD模型的我国长期护理保险筹资优化方案设计. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202211.00018

  薛惠元, 张永高. 共同富裕视域下我国长期护理保险政策评价与优化路径研究——基于PMC指数模型. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202306.00018

  杨红燕, 范维珂, 蒋雯静. 长期护理保险基金筹资负担的测算——基于第二批8城长护险试点方案的比较分析. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202306.00010

  孙晨晗, 胡 敏, 陈 文. 德国长期护理服务质量监管的经验与启示. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202310.00003

  孙敬华, 刘朝旭. 政策工具视角下中国老年长期照护政策量化研究*. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202306.00014

  杨晨柳, 方安, 胡佳慧, 王茜. 国外高校科学数据长期保存系统的建设实践与启示. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202010.00845

  龚曦. 德国护理救助制度支付机制如何实现差异化兜底保障？——以风险嵌入式需求溢出理论为视角. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202312.00003

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2024-05-20	bmr.202409.00047V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论