• 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅
  • 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅

伊伐布雷定对COPD合并HFpEF患者心肺运动试验参数、心率变异性及hs-CRP、NT-proBNP的影响

通讯作者: 叶懿萱, lww5731@126.com
DOI:10.12201/bmr.202408.00002
声明:预印本系统所发表的论文仅用于最新科研成果的交流与共享,未经同行评议,因此不建议直接应用于指导临床实践。

  • 摘要:目的探究伊伐布雷定对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并左心室射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)患者心肺运动试验参数、心率变异性(HRV)及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)的影响。方法97例COPD合并HFpEF患者随机数字表法分组为对照组(n=48,常规对症处理联合富马酸比索洛尔片治疗)及伊伐布雷定组(n=49,在对照组基础上联合伊伐布雷定治疗),比较两组疗效,观察治疗前后两组心肺运动试验参数、HRV、hs-CRP、NT-proBNP、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评分、6min步行距离变化,比较两组心脏不良事件及药物不良反应。结果伊伐布雷定组3例脱落、对照组2例脱落。治疗后伊伐布雷定组总有效率(91.30%)明显高于对照组(76.09%)(P<0.05)。治疗后,伊伐布雷定组、对照组峰值氧耗量(Peak VCO2)、无氧代谢阈值时氧耗量(AT)、24h窦性心律RR间期标准差(SDNN)、24h相邻正常RR间期差值均方根(RMSSD)、24h相邻正常RR间期差值>50ms百分比(RNN50)较治疗前明显增高,且前者明显高于后者(P<0.05)。治疗后两组二氧化碳通气当量斜率(VE/VCO2)、hs-CRP、NT-proBNP、SGRQ评分、CAT评分较治疗前明显降低,且伊伐布雷定组较对照组明显低(P<0.05)。治疗后两组6min步行距离较治疗前明显延长,且伊伐布雷定组较对照组明显长(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,伊伐布雷定组再住院率明显低(P<0.05),死亡率及不良反应总发生率略低(P>0.05)。结论 伊伐布雷定在COPD合并HFpEF患者治疗中,可明显改善患者心肺运动功能和心率变异性,有效改善患者预后存活质量,同时明显降低hs-CRP、NT-proBNP水平及再入院率,安全性高。

    关键词: 慢性阻塞性肺病射血分数保留的心衰伊伐布雷定心肺运动试验心率变异性1

     

    Abstract: Objective? To investigate the effect of ivabradine on cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters, heart rate variability (HRV), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods? A total of 97 patients with COPD and HFpEF were divided into the control group (n=48, conventional symptomatic treatment combined with bisoprolol fumarate tablets) and the ivabradine group (n=49, ivabradine treatment on the basis of the treatment of control group) using the random number table method. Therapeutic effects in the two groups were compared. The changes in cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters, HRV, hs-CRP, NT-proBNP, St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores and 6-minute walking distance after treatment were observed. Adverse cardiac events and drug reactions in the two groups were compared. Results? 3 cases in the ivabradine group and 2 cases in the control group dropped out of the study. After treatment, the total effective rate of the ivabradine group (91.30%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (76.09%) (P<0.05). After treatment, there were significant decreases in peak oxygen consumption (Peak VCO2), anaerobic threshold (AT), standard deviation of RR intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD) and percetange of adjacent RR intervals differing by more than 50 milliseconds (PNN50) in the ivabradine group and the control group. Moreover, above parameters in the former group were significantly higher (P<0.05). After treatment, there were significant decreases in ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2), hs-CRP, NT-proBNP, SGRQ scores and CAT scores in both groups. Meanwhile, above parameters in the ivabradine group were significantly lower (P<0.05). After treatment, 6-minute walking distance of the two groups increased significantly, and 6-minute walking distance of the ivabradine group was significantly longer (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the readmission rate of the ivabradine group was significantly lower (P<0.05). The mortality rate and total incidence of adverse reactions in the ivabradine group were slightly lower (P>0.05). Conclusion? Applying ivabradine in the treatment of patients with COPD and HFpEF can significantly improve their cardiopulmonary exercise function, HRV, prognosis and quality of life, and significantly reducing the levels of hs-CRP and NT-proBNP and the readmission rate, with high safety.

    Key words: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Ivabradine; Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; Heart rate variability

    提交时间:2024-08-01

    版权声明:作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权,预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
  • 图表

  • 何倩, 李亦梅. 心率变异性用于慢性疼痛的临床研究进展. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00065

    薛琴丹. 健康素养在慢性心力衰竭患者症状负担与疾病不确定感间的调节效应分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00062

    张一颖, 杜昱, 李萌, 李园白, 杨硕, 刘方舟, 王静, 李逸豪, 杨阳. 基于医案大数据分析系统探索冠心病古方用药特点. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202110.00027

    田凤, 陈媛, 陈诗琪, 张榕祥, 朱晨阳. ERAS在心脏瓣膜病患者围手术期应用效果的Meta分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00008

    王可欣, 张少强. 不同功效组合的中药复方联合常规西药治疗冠心病合并抑郁的网状Meta 分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00055

    王玲, 易钢. 基于物联网技术的运动监测评价系统的研究与分析. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202003.00072

    金宇梦, 李亚平. 调神养心汤治疗心肾不交型围绝经期失眠的临床观察. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202408.00031

    郭慧芳, 沈沛成. 慢性肾脏病中医非药物疗法研究概述. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202409.00054

    何艳平, 张晓丹, 姚强. 家庭医生签约服务的健康效应及作用机制研究——来自6省12县1 191位农村慢性病患者的证据. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202409.00051

    殷方, 吴志强, 马敬东. 参与互联网医疗对慢性病患者价值共创意愿的影响研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00025

  • 序号 提交日期 编号 操作
    1 2024-07-01

    bmr.202408.00002V1

    下载
  • 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者

引用格式

叶懿萱. 伊伐布雷定对COPD合并HFpEF患者心肺运动试验参数、心率变异性及hs-CRP、NT-proBNP的影响. 2024. biomedRxiv.202408.00002

访问统计

  • 阅读量:184
  • 下载量: 0
  • 评论数:0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误